Therefore, the question is whether these social transformations (as relative, limited or contradictory as you want for technical and specialist analysis) are perceived by the population and in what way. There are different sources with data in our region. mobile phone number list The regional study Latinobarometro asks, for example: "How fair do you think the distribution of income is in (your country)?" This variable has four response modes: “very fair”, “fair”, “unfair”, “very unfair”. In 2002, 82% of those surveyed considered the distribution of income in their countries mobile phone number list to be unfair or very unfair. In 2013, the figure for these answers had dropped to 69%, accompanying the shortening of the inequality gaps.
But in 2018, the percentage of the population that perceived income distribution in their country as inequitable had risen again to 80%, although the mobile phone number list Gini index was still far from the levels it presented at the beginning of the century in our region. With these data, could we venture that the perception of inequality decreases when inequality decreases, but does not accompany it when the latter stabilizes? Possibly yes, as studies in other mobile phone number list contexts show. In any case, it is necessary to recognize that the objective social changes and the subjective perceptions of the population are not mechanically related in the way of «reflexes».
In particular, the perception of inequality and mobile phone number list inequity in citizenship implies a complex subjective evaluation, which brings into play ideological-political positions (for example, research shows that people on the left are more sensitive to inequality than those on the right),